
In the name of Allah, Most Compassionate, Most Merciful
Note: Before reading this entry, familiarize yourself with the basic beliefs of the Submitters sect (and its resulting branches), its founders (Submitters: Rashad Khalifa, Reformist Submitters: Edip Yuksel), and a brief overview of its history.
One of the most controversial aspects of this belief [apart from the belief in a messenger after Muhammad (pbuh), conflicting viewpoints of the roles of messengers and prophets, its rejection of Hadiths and Sunnah, among others] is the corrupt and appalling concept of the "Satanic Verses". It is important to note that the belief in "Satanic verse(s)" existed prior to the formation of this sect and will not be discussed in this post (perhaps in another entry).
The Satanic Verses, according to Rashad Khalifa, were verses falsely inserted into the Quran as it was being compiled. This conclusion was based on his finding of which he claims is a numerical code/pattern where all verses in the Quran, apart from two, shared the same common denominator (the number 19) which filtered the false verses from the Quran. The two verses are:
"There has certainly come to you a Messenger from among yourselves. Grievous to him is what you suffer; (he is) concerned over you and to the believers is kind and merciful. But if they turn away (O Muhammad), say: 'Sufficient for me is Allah; there is no deity except Him. On Him I have relied, and He is the Lord of the Great Throne.'" - The Holy Quran [9:128-129]
Keep in mind, the Submitters sect preaches heavily on Quran alone, the Quran being the perfect and protected word of God (through code 19) and the rejection of any outside sources (i.e. Hadith and Sunnah). One may wonder why these verses would ever be considered "Satanic" in the first place, there is however, no need to dwell on this claim further when there is evidence from within the Quran itself. Since the Submitters rely only on the perfect Quran, then the evidences from the Quran should outweigh their claims.
These two verses are the only verses considered to be false/satanic by the Submitters (not to be confused with the translation of "Muslims" itself. The Submitters sect is also referred to as the Quranist sect, the Quran Only sect, the Hadith Rejectors, and other terminologies as well). One can then conclude that every other verse in the Quran is accurate and authentic.
There are many verses in the Quran that refute the concept of the "Satanic Verses" which are being ignored and have had their translations manipulated. Fortunately, both Rashad Khalifa and Edip Yuksel have not yet had the chance to manipulate the entirety of their translation to conform to their ideology. Allah (swt) clearly states:
"Falsehood cannot approach it from before it or from behind it; (it is) a revelation from a (Lord who is) Wise and Praiseworthy." - The Holy Quran [41:42]
"Indeed, it is We who sent down the Reminder (the Quran) and indeed, We will be its guardian/protector." - The Holy Quran [15:9]
"Nay! This is a Glorious Quran, (inscribed) in a Preserved Tablet" - The Holy Quran [85:21-22]
"This is the Book (the Quran), whereof there is no doubt, a guidance to those who are righteous." - The Holy Quran [2:2]
"And it was not (possible) for this Quran to be produced by other than Allah, but (it is) a confirmation of what was before it and a detailed explanation of the (former) Scripture, wherein there is no doubt, from the Lord of the Worlds." - The Holy Quran [10:37]
"(This is) the Revelation of the Book wherein there is no doubt, from the Lord of the Worlds." - The Holy Quran [32:2]
"And the word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and justice. None can alter His words, and He is the Hearing, the Knowing." - The Holy Quran [6:115]
"And We did not send before you any messenger or prophet except that when he spoke [or recited], Satan threw into it [some falsehood/misunderstanding]. But Allah abolishes that which Satan throws in; then Allah makes precise His verses. And Allah is Knowing and Wise." - The Holy Quran [22:52]
One of the above verses would have been enough to refute the concept of the Satanic Verses itself. The Quran in many instances confirms that Allah's verses are accurate and protected, thus, the existence of any verse within the Quran that is not from Allah Himself is impossible.
Many will argue that the term used in some of these verse is Thikr (Reminder) and not Quran, however, the term Thikr refers to the Quran. Provided below are the translations of the above verses from both Rashad Khalifa and Free Minds (both translations of the Submitters sect):
"Those who have rejected the Quran's (thikr) proof when it came to them have also rejected an Honorable book. No falsehood could enter it, in the past or in the future; a revelation from a most Wise, Praiseworthy. What is said to you is precisely what was said to the previous messengers. Your Lord possesses forgiveness, and He also possesses painful retribution. If We made it a non-Arabic Quran they would have said, 'Why did it come down in that language?' Whether it is Arabic or non-Arabic, say, 'For those who believe, it is a guide and healing. As for those who disbelieve, they will be deaf and blind to it as if they are being addressed from faraway.'" - The Holy Quran [41:41-44]
"Surely, those who have rejected the Reminder when it came to them, and it is an Honorable Scripture. No falsehood could enter it, presently or afterwards; a revelation from a most Wise, Praiseworthy. What is being said to you is the same that was said to the messengers before you. Your Lord has forgiveness, and a painful retribution. And had We made it a non-Arabic Quran, they would have said: 'If only its verses were made clear!' Non-Arabic and Arabic, say: 'For those who believe, it is a guide and healing. As for those who disbelieve, there is a deafness in their ears, and they are blind to it. These will be called from a place far away.'" - The Holy Quran [41:41-44]
To confirm the translations, visit both the Compared Quran Translations page and the Quran Database website (variations occur in the different translations, but thikr remains translated as "Quran" or in reference to it, as seen above".
To elaborate, the "Thikr" is defined in the Quran as:
- A revelation from God - The Holy Quran [41:42]
- An Honorable Book - The Holy Quran [41:41]
- Protected/Guarded - The Holy Quran [15:9]
- Falsehood cannot enter it from before or behind (present or future) - The Holy Quran [41:42]
- Revealed in Arabic - The Holy Quran [41:44]
Furthermore:
"(This is) a revelation from the Compassionate, the Merciful. A Book whose verses have been detailed, an Arabic Quran for a people who know, as a giver of good tidings and a warner; but most of them turn away, so they do not hear. And they say: 'our hearts are within coverings from that to which you invite us, and in our ears is deafness, and between us and you is a partition, so work; indeed we are working.'" - The Holy Quran [41:2-5]
What other than the Quran (apart from the fact that the verses already make a clear connection that the Quran itself is the Reminder) is a revelation that has been protected from corruption and change, and was revealed in Arabic ? Thus, we conclude that the thikr is in fact the Quran. Since this is clearly the fact, how is it that two verses can be falsely injected in the Quran (contradicting verses 15:9 & 41:42)?
Trying to prove that the verses are Satanic will only mean that the Submitters sect is indicating that Allah (swt) is incapable of (astaghfirullah) protecting the Quran and keeping His promise. Another issue would be arguing that the verses provided above are also Satanic, since they contradict the idea that there are any in the first place. Therefore, the concept of Satanic Verses is not supported in the Quran; rather it is refuted wholly. There are no false verses. The Submitters must either consider the Satanic verses a myth, or the Quran itself a corruption and thus their religion as well.
Allah (swt) knows best.
If you have any questions, comments, or suggestions; feel free to post them here.
1 June 2008
This one is a pretty solid argument!
ReplyDeleteThis is not related to the Satanic Verses, this is just a comment about using a verse IN the Qura'an to prove that it's %100 holy, or protected...etc
ReplyDeleteYou're source can't be your proof at the same time! It's like saying: I'm telling you the truth cause I'M TELLING YOU THE TRUTH.
All you need to do is add this sentence: "Indeed, it is We who sent down the Reminder (the Quran) and indeed, We will be its guardian/protector." - to any book, and it will become legit?
I'm not saying the Qura'an is or isn't the word of God, cause that's a big debate... I'm just saying, if you want to be objecting, using a sentence INSIDE it to prove that it wasn't tampered with, doesn't do the job
Leafless Eve:
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. I would like to redirect you to read this same entry as it is an argument made against those posed by the Submitters (Quran Only, Hadith Rejectors, etc) and not an attempt at arguing for the validity of the Quran itself. Your comment is a broad one suggesting that proof from within a scripture as evidence is not one most would consider (in fact, anyone outside that faith will reject proof within that religion which uses sources from within that state it is correct, rather than proving its validity through logic and its non-contradictory message). The issue of the authenticity and validity of the Quran is a whole other argument. What is being argued here is that, since Submitters accept every word within the Quran as being legitimate save for what they term as "Satanic Verses" (again, this is different than the other Satanic Verses that are often argued about, we are focusing on the Submitters' stand on them), we use the very source to prove their view as illegitimate. Does that make sense? It would be illogical, on the other hand, to use outside sources to prove a source incorrect since people of that faith would argue that the only valid proof/evidence would be from within the source itself. I hope this cleared it out for you and look forward to any other/further comments or questions you may have.
Peace be upon you.
Rashad Khalifah's explanation of the law of preservation (even though he considered the last to verses of Soorah 9 to be false) has been refuted:
ReplyDeletehttp://islamic-replies.ucoz.com/2/Rashad_Khalifa_Law_Preservation.html
Also, read how Khalifah contradicts himself again:
http://islamic-replies.ucoz.com/2/Rashad_Khalifa_Contradicts_Himself.html